Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:11:43 +0200 From: Anton Blajev <valqk@lozenetz.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: NAS-Port Message-ID: <1077315102.75490.3.camel@valqk.upper.lan>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello there, It's me again :) I'm writing with an idea, As we saw NAS-Port is not obligatory, it's used to say about the port client's using to connect, okay... but why ins't ppp sending NAS-Port = tun0 for example (with the other type value: something like this: NAS-Port-Type = "Virtual" NAS-Port = "tun0" ) Wouldn't this be good to be done , because freeradius (and myabe other radiuses) are using NAS-Port for unique identifyer to give an ip addres... so there are no duplicates... So, I'm asking... wouldn't be more proper and accurate ppp to send NAS-Port = tun or it's being done on purpose not to do this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1077315102.75490.3.camel>