Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:10:50 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, thierry@herbelot.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, Joshua Coombs <jcoombs@gwi.net> Subject: Re: Loss of ed(4) in a RC1 booted in qemu Message-ID: <200510131210.55135.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200510131621.07299.thierry@herbelot.com> References: <200510131331.27906.thierry@herbelot.com> <dilo06$fb2$1@sea.gmane.org> <200510131621.07299.thierry@herbelot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 13 October 2005 10:21 am, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > Le Thursday 13 October 2005 15:38, Joshua Coombs a �crit : > > Welp, while I have no real help, I can point out this was > > reported by another user on the stable list, QEMU + RC1 == no ed > > well, I should have looked there before posting here ;-) (sorry for > the excellent Michel talon at lpthe.jussieu.fr : I should have > seeen your post) > > > I'm kinda dreading upgrading my 386... I'll pull down the generic > > kernel and do a test boot to see if it's a QEMU thing or a > > reguression in RC1 > > for me, it's definitely a qemu thing : I have two other machines > upgraded to 6.0 post-RC1, and both are working *fine* ; moreover > one is a notebook with a pcmcia ed(4), and this NIC works perfectly > (the issue is therefore seen only on qemu) QEMU emulates RTL8029: ed0: <RealTek 8029> port 0xc100-0xc1ff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0 ed0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0xc100 and Warner Losh MFC'd new ed(4) right before 6.0-RC1: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510081800.j98I0fRI089493 The new driver does more aggressive probing and it seems QEMU cannot handle it. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510131210.55135.jkim>