Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:20:21 +0000 (GMT) From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>, "'current@freebsd.org'" <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104172219050.11647-100000@www.everquick.net> In-Reply-To: <200104172200.f3HM0TI09802@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:00:29 -0700 (PDT) > From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> > > WILL be a performance hit. WILL introduce major bugs. IS unnecessary, > DOESN'T make any sense whatsoever, is at CROSS PURPOSES with goals > already stated (not having any serious contention in the first place), > REQUIRES massive changes to the code with not a chance in hell of > producing an equivalent performance improvement for the trouble. What was the name of that network stack... There was a net stack that spent significant amounts of effort creating something asynchronous, with fancy preemption. In the end, they trashed the whole thing, because run-to-completion was faster. Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet / EternalCommerce Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0104172219050.11647-100000>