Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 17:32:21 +0100 (BST) From: Bryn Paul Arnold Jones <bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk> To: dyson@freebsd.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi>, julian@ref.tfs.com, hackers@freebsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Unices are created equal, but ... Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960415172256.1816B-100000@gytha.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199604151348.IAA09000@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, John S. Dyson wrote:
[...]
> > If somebody wants to do benchmarking,I'd suggest using at least
> > - lmbench (nice microbenchmark)
> > - bonnie (reasonable disk performance benchmark)
> > - webstone (or something similar. But use "apache" as the server, not
> > some braindead horror like NCSA).
> > - ???
> >
> Above list is ok, but CERTAINLY not sufficient.
>
> > (the three mentioned should cover different areas, all very reasonable,
> > but have I missed some important area?)
> >
> Above list has no testing under VM load. That is where memory scheduling
> policies start taking effect. There are other forms of loading also, like
> tty subsystems (some people still use those.) Another, is how well do big disk
> farms work (lots of sustained concurrent I/O)? How does the system work
> with many many TCP connections (little benchmarks like lmbench are interesting
> but don't show performance in an ISP or large workstation situation)?
>
> John
>
How about running those three at the same time, it sould put the box
under some considerable load.
Bryn
--
PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence
again :( | initiated.
/ This space is intentionally left
| blank, apart from this text ;-)
\____________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.960415172256.1816B-100000>