Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 09:27:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "Lars Fredriksen" <fredriks@mcs.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree confused? Message-ID: <m0sgC6b-0003kwC@mercury.mcs.com> In-Reply-To: <199508091346.GAA29613@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Aug 9, 95 06:46:12 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami writes: > > * While building the world, I see the following messages from mtree: > * > * mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include > * missing: ./machine (not created: File exists) > * missing: ./net (not created: File exists) > * missing: ./netccitt (not created: File exists) > * missing: ./netinet (not created: File exists) > * > * > * Now, how come the file can be both missing and exsisting??? > > Hehe, I assume you didn't try "ls -l /usr/include"? :) > > Satoshi > > P.S. They are symlinks.... > Hi, Yes, I know they are symlinks :-) , but why isn't mtree smart enough to figure out that ./machine for instance isn't missing? Lars -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lars Fredriksen fredriks@mcs.com (home) lars@fredriks.pr.mcs.net (home-home) fredriks@asiago.cs.wisc.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0sgC6b-0003kwC>