Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:58:59 +0200 From: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py-gdbm or py-bsddb as run-dependency? Message-ID: <42D60D33.7030004@webonaut.com> In-Reply-To: <42D5A040.2050806@marcuscom.com> References: <42D000C9.90109@webonaut.com> <1121057207.61794.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <42D56C65.3020200@webonaut.com> <42D5A040.2050806@marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke schrieb: > Franz Klammer wrote: > | Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > | > |> I think option one and two are good choices. Maybe you could do > |> something like portupgrade offers now using OPTIONS. > | > | > | are these two db's compatible? what if i use autodedect and > | install the wrong db on a (possible) reinstall? > > No idea. I thought from your previous email that gdesklets could use > either. > gdesklets use "shelve" http://docs.python.org/lib/module-shelve.html to access the config database and it never stores the config unless i had installed one of gdbm or bsddb. > | > | what about this option: > | OPTIONS= GDBM "install py-gdbm instead py-bsddb for config storage" off > > That looks reasonable, but the description may be a bit long. > ok! then i will do it in this way. tested the description in a unresized xterm (80x25) and it fits exactly in the screen - but will re-try it in the console before ;-) Thanks for you help. Franz > Joe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42D60D33.7030004>