Date: 04 Jul 2003 08:12:00 -0400 From: Adam <blueeskimo@gmx.net> To: FreeBSD-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Opinions on ftp-server Message-ID: <1057320720.21820.32.camel@jake> In-Reply-To: <20030704025952.GA2838@panix.com> References: <3F04AB61.2010405@intersonic.se> <1057276908.21820.24.camel@jake> <20030704025952.GA2838@panix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-lZ1tSpTXB6FuMCVw8QL0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 22:59, Monte Milanuk wrote: > So what makes pureftpd so much better tahn vsftpd? >=20 > Seems to work well for RedHat, SuSE, and OpenBSD, to name a few. >=20 > http://vsftpd.beasts.org/ I should ask you, what specific advantages does vsftpd have over Pure-FTPd? I have been using Pure-FTPd for over a year and am very pleased; should I switch? --=20 Adam <blueeskimo@gmx.net> --=-lZ1tSpTXB6FuMCVw8QL0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/BW8QWxHCbev227wRAhZgAJ42mUMrWcznzPoG48dsgDsQcoVaEgCeN9wh WKZW1bVgbzb4QUHhRpmrcvg= =a/3Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lZ1tSpTXB6FuMCVw8QL0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1057320720.21820.32.camel>