Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 18:59:24 +0100 (MET) From: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij) To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: taob@io.org, bugs@ns1.win.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Guido's pwd_mkdb improvements (fwd) Message-ID: <199509251759.SAA08425@gvr.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <pZeWYPmCoJ@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Sep 25, 95 06:55:20 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > In message <199509241950.UAA06285@gvr.win.tue.nl> Guido van Rooij > writes: > > >A simple observation: most master.passwd updates are done because > >only one line needs to be updated. So I added an option to > >pwd_mkdb that only touches a specific record. > > Does it handle in right way users with different names but the same uid? > I remember 1.x one-record-update version update only first one > in this case... I.e. how store-by-uid works in this case? > Yes. It does handle them correctly. The username is used as the identifier, not the uid. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509251759.SAA08425>