Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:41:46 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Jonathan Arnold <jdarnold@buddydog.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Problems building libiconv
Message-ID:  <20021018034146.GC57990@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200210172238170135.12787B42@mail.speakeasy.net>
References:  <200210172238170135.12787B42@mail.speakeasy.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:38:17PM -0400, Jonathan Arnold wrote:

> portupgrade -m -j10 libiconv
> 
> Where the "-m -j10" passes the -j10 to the make, which set the number of
> jobs make will try to do at one time. I read somewhere that if you have
> a multi-CPU machine like I do, to try it with -j10. It has worked up til
> now, but it seems to break the make for libiconv. Should I post this as
> a bug somewhere? It works fine without it.

No, this is not supported.  It will accidentally work for some ports,
but as you have discovered it is not guaranteed.

Kris

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9r4L5Wry0BWjoQKURArJ8AKCTY9lcksgK9vnd35q/NX00ekjq7QCeJ0gn
axUsdrbUjhYYxttVuLjPlvE=
=oaWv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021018034146.GC57990>