Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:59:09 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r189765 - in head: . lib/libc lib/libc/nls Message-ID: <20090314065909.85bd441f.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131607250.6590@thor.farley.org> References: <200903131040.n2DAecSO061131@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903130910540.4522@thor.farley.org> <20090313182216.GA8844@zim.MIT.EDU> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131331320.6076@thor.farley.org> <20090314060159.c508619b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131607250.6590@thor.farley.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Sean! On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT) "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the > >> license. > > Really? > ambigous > > Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like > > Perl or MIT). It can use with (L)GPL. > > WWW: http://citrus.bsdclub.org/ > OK. Technically, the website is not ambiguous. It is the license that > is ambiguous. :) At least, they claim it is: Ah, OK. They, Citrus developers, consider that it is licensed under BSD License on *BSD, at least. In fact, on NetBSD/OpenBSD, it is licensed under BSD License, and we can use it under BSD License. But it may be used on other environment like X. So it is licensed under dual(multiple?) license.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090314065909.85bd441f.nork>