Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:48:51 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Victor Balada Diaz <victor@bsdes.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues Message-ID: <20081216074851.GD62771@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20081216071919.GR1320@alf.bsdes.net> References: <20081210102800.GH37837@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081210113225.GD1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081210120719.GK37837@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081211075707.GH1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081211081045.GJ1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081211090056.GH42370@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081211095021.GL1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081212121309.GM1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081215090207.GN1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081216071919.GR1320@alf.bsdes.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing > > seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error. > > netstat -i reports no errors and everything is fine. Thanks a lot! > > > > I'm going to deploy the patches on our production machines. > > > > I've been able to trigger interrupt storms with ATA code, though. > > After deploying it in various machines this night i've found in the > logs messages like this one: > > re0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > > I know you told me this is harmless, so this is just so you Yes, it's not real watchdog timeout as long as re(4) still works correctly. > know it's happening. > Ok. I'll update re(4) when I find spare time. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081216074851.GD62771>