Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 13:06:06 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@haven.uniserve.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "route" crashes kernel... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950221130015.16270A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <9502212007.AA06058@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Feb 1995, Garrett Wollman wrote: > `-link sl0' doesn't make much sense as a destination. Perhaps you > meant to say: > > route add -inet 198.53.215.253 -interface ip-address-of-sl0 > > which would mean that the other end of sl0 has an alias address. Well, that does work, but I was hoping it could be done the Netblazer/KA9Q way where you can directly specify the interface in the route and where most if not all of the interfaces have the same IP address. I notice that ifconfig can make a route like this... Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950221130015.16270A-100000>