Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:01:35 -0000 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, mitigator@gmail.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] Message-ID: <20041020154026.GA40554@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20041020.093211.78703993.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> <20041020.093211.78703993.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote.. > In message: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> > jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator@gmail.com> writes: > : What are the performance implications of a debug kernel? > : > : Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down > : to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for > : sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any > : significant performance hits.. > > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much. > > However, I'm going going to take exception that it isn't a disk space Sure.. and we have plenty of Viagra spam to prove it ;-) > starting to fill up. In addition, we sometimes deploy new kernels to > the field and 16MB takes a lot longer to upload than 3MB (think really > bad connectivity to many of the remote locations our systems may be > deployed in). But I assume you would run a customised kernel on these machines anyway? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020154026.GA40554>