Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:32:26 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: - <user@celeritystorm.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD with ProPolice ? Message-ID: <20050116173226.GA70453@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41EA6BE1.5090205@celeritystorm.com> References: <41EA6BE1.5090205@celeritystorm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:28:01PM +0000, - wrote: > Hey, >=20 > I'd like to know if this patch (=20 > http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ ) still applies=20 > on 5.3-RELEASE. I know some apps need to write to the stack, and these=20 > will fail with this patch on.. Anyone knows of such commonly used=20 > applications ? A few years ago when I tried, XFree86 wouldn't work properly (probably the module loader). This is out of date information though. Kris --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB6qUqWry0BWjoQKURAkDpAKDtKJ0C7WRgFOqUwaNMBm0fWrr8ewCfYju7 O/pliBEU7wl4Lg55Xo1hpfU= =StfJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050116173226.GA70453>