Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 10:59:38 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: lutz@muc.de (Lutz Albers) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION Message-ID: <199602081759.KAA08296@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <v02140404ad3f7775d37c@[193.174.4.22]> from "Lutz Albers" at Feb 8, 96 11:43:30 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -I know. That was the source of my consternation. I specified a > -comamnd line of "cvs diff -c" and that is what came out. > > Hello, > > is there are reason not to use 'cvs rdiff' ? This should create patch > output, at least according to the cvs man page. cvs [rdiff aborted]: must specify at least one revision/date! Apparently, patch can take "cvs diff" output as input. Go figure. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602081759.KAA08296>