Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 22:51:08 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." <bsder@allcaps.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug filing broken? Message-ID: <20030714055108.GA13928@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307131515490.1646-100000@mail.allcaps.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307131515490.1646-100000@mail.allcaps.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:40:21PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: > I tried to file a bug for one of my -CURRENT machines using send-pr and= =20 > got the following result back: >=20 > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > ><FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org> > > (reason: 450 <taz.allcaps.org.>: Helo command rejected: Host not fou= nd) >=20 > Presumably this means that the mailer is trying to reverse lookup my=20 > hostname, and it doesn't exist. That's true, as I have been experimentin= g=20 > with this stuff behind my firewall on my private net. >=20 > Fine. I'll file a bug via the web interface. >=20 > Go to: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html >=20 > >The web-based bug interface is currently disabled. >=20 >=20 > This is annoying. A user is already peeved that FreeBSD has a bug, and > now the bug sending mechanism has a bug. In addition, the web bug > submission is offline. >=20 > The send to FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org should not have failed in the > first place. Even if FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org needs spam > protection, all of the emails coming into it have a signature which makes > spam analysis incredibly easy. Please reopen FreeBSD-gnats-submit so tha= t=20 > it accepts all input and rejects based upon content. >=20 > Another idea is to rewrite send-pr so that it submits bug reports directly > to a port on a server somewhere. Using port 80 and a dedicated receive > server would get around firewalling issues. >=20 > The alternative is to reopen the web form. However, I find send-pr much= =20 > more useful (less cutting and pasting). >=20 > Submitting a bug report should be the easiest, most robust and error free > task the system carries out. We await your patches :) Kris --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/EkTMWry0BWjoQKURAtYJAKDLsmOaMEw4Fa4yR0eg+ZE7XPUzlgCg1chd N/iL6MvTYgMeNq926sAg6o8= =MLdR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030714055108.GA13928>