Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:17:57 +0000 From: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> To: Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> Cc: "xfce@FreeBSD.org" <xfce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Update multimedia/xfce4-parole or not? Message-ID: <20140129181757.1faf63c14643883517a0257c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKJAkzsXL1NZpbUM7hK4Qc8Fo5RdSYc0Ce-XiL_XiRKyPQx3VA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHcdu2pEBmDfZyN8Vd%2BKdU0TwFnv3TqJUe5y0_S4AMB%2Bgx3K6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKJAkzsXL1NZpbUM7hK4Qc8Fo5RdSYc0Ce-XiL_XiRKyPQx3VA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:00:40 +0200 Juris Kaminskis <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> wrote: > 2014. gada 25. janv. 20:59, "Olivier Duchateau" <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> > rakstīja: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > New stable version of Parole has been published today, but it depends > > of development library (libxfce4ui 4.11.0). > > > > I wonder if these ports need to be in ports tree or we must wait. > > People who want stability should probably not track the latest ports tree > but instead branches. So i think ports tree can be updated already for us > to test it. It's not easy. If we update to latest development releases, we need to patch some libraries (x11/libexo) or remove some defaults options (especially in Thunar). I think it's better to keep ports tree the more "functional" particularly -HEAD branch (stable branch synchronizes with it). But if you want to test it, I wrote documentation in order to update Parole [1] (and other core libraries). [1] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/parole-unstable.html -- olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140129181757.1faf63c14643883517a0257c>