Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 05:28:17 +0200 From: Sergio Carrillo <scarrillo@arsystel.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org Message-ID: <40DCED51.4070003@arsystel.com> In-Reply-To: <20040626031020.GA1839@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200406251853.45449.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> <20040626031020.GA1839@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:53:45PM -0800, Beecher Rintoul wrote: > > >>I have been using XFree86 for some time now, and it's time to do some >>upgrades. I have heard that the new X.Org might be a better choice. Does >>anyone have an opinion on it? With the time involved to compile on a 400 MHz >>box, I thought I would ask before I just dove in. >> >> > >The x.org packages don't yet build on the cluster. > >Kris > > I'm running it, the only problem is to deal with dependencies in some ports (pkdb -F). I needed it to support radeon9600, but don't want to install the Xfree-snap server: Release Date: 18 December 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.2 i386 [ELF] Current Operating System: FreeBSD sh5.lan 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 21 22:15:57 CEST 2004 root@sh5.lan:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/sh5 i386 Build Date: 19 June 2004
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40DCED51.4070003>