Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:53:15 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw, keep-state and limit Message-ID: <evu6sg$q2i$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070415144922.A39338@xorpc.icir.org> References: <evu0kp$9u9$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070415144922.A39338@xorpc.icir.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Luigi Rizzo wrote: > if i remember well (the implementation dates back to 2001 or so) > you just need to use "limit", as it implicitly installs > a dynamic state entry (same as keep-state). Thanks, I'll try it tomorrow. If it works, may I suggest a change: make the error message say "keep-state is redundant with limits" and proceed like only "limits" exists? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGIp7LldnAQVacBcgRArqtAJ9kfZ/QrGFhQ9prwmEeY8pikFsLMwCg1D+U 2aQjCaCtj+vV/c1jcDPcIFw= =O4d4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evu6sg$q2i$1>