Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 06:02:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> To: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" <admin@dru.dn.ua> Cc: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: new ATA bug Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0205190553580.9977-100000@sysadmin> In-Reply-To: <20020519093323.GA40344@dru.dn.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > I disabled second channel in kernel config. Why driver seeing second > channel at all??? You said you had this in your kernel config: # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 The device you commented out was ata1 at isa. Here is your dmesg: atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 The device probed was on pci0. As far as I can see, when the ata driver attaches via pci, there is no way to disable ata1 from the kernel config file. > Why previous version ata worked properly, while new version working > incorrectly?? I don't know the answer to this either. But did you try Igor Bykhalo's suggestion of putting 'di ata1' in your /boot/loader.conf? -- Tod MCQuillin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.44.0205190553580.9977-100000>