Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:35:11 -0500 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r186955 - in head/sys: conf netinet Message-ID: <d763ac660901101535h6e434c91y811c21563a63d102@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901102331510.16794@fledge.watson.org> References: <200901091602.n09G2Jj1061164@svn.freebsd.org> <4967A500.30205@fsn.hu> <4967B6D9.90001@elischer.org> <4967C539.2060803@fsn.hu> <d763ac660901091411x40eb8084v134f0ab2189afddb@mail.gmail.com> <49686A30.4000205@fsn.hu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901101026220.16794@fledge.watson.org> <d763ac660901101012icb544b1v3ff940bd39f1abb6@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901102331510.16794@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/1/10 Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>: > If the API turns out to be effectly semantically the same, or better, then I > think the suggestion is to entirely replace, rather than supplement, the > socket option you just added with it. There's no point in having > pointlessly divergent APIs where it can be avoided. I'll look into it. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660901101535h6e434c91y811c21563a63d102>