Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:40:59 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Pavel Bychykhin <pavel.priv@hte.vl.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some of ZFS ACLs doesn't work as expected Message-ID: <06453437-D034-41C2-8B7F-15B228AD2532@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua> References: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Pavel Bychykhin w dniu 18 sie 2012, o godz. = 19:48: > Dear community! >=20 > After my experiments with ZFS, I concluded, that permissions = "delete_child" and "delete" are ignored. > For the create/update/delete operation a list of "rwxp" = (read_data/write_data/execute/append_data) is fully sufficient. They are not ignored, but yes, write access on a directory is enough to = delete a file. > No need to specify the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions at all, = or I don't understand something? Unless you need them - no, you don't. That's why these bits are not set = in a default case (so called 'trivial ACL', i.e. no ACL set on a file). --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?06453437-D034-41C2-8B7F-15B228AD2532>