Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:51:35 -0800 (PST) From: dima@rdy.com (Dima Ruban) To: Blaz Zupan <blaz@amis.net> Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <200003270851.AAA93733@sivka.rdy.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003270817180.454-100000@gold.amis.net> from Blaz Zupan at "Mar 27, 2000 08:22:25 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Blaz Zupan writes: > > I'll restate it, hopefully more clearly. How's this: > > > > And then when some Linux app wants to use parts of procfs that are implemented > > in both Linux native procfs and FreeBSD native procfs, but which are not in > > FreeBSD native linprocfs? > > ... then "someone" implements the missing feature in FreeBSD native > linprocfs :) But still, isn't having a linprocfs that half of the Linux > apps can use better than having no linprocfs and not being able to run the > apps at all? Nobody's actually saying "nuke it and bury it". The suggestion was to move to ports collection. > I'm not sure how easy it would be (probably not very, because it depends > on FreeBSD sources?) to put it in ports together with the Linux emulation > libraries. After all, its of no use if you don't have the Linux emulation > running. Well, generally speaking, everything in ports depends on FreeBSD sources to the certain extent. > > Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://home.amis.net/blaz/ > Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia > > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003270851.AAA93733>