Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 11:29:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 287135] Large Unix SOCK_SEQPACKET messages do not get truncated Message-ID: <bug-287135-7501-orTk2pZxgC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-287135-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-287135-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287135 --- Comment #1 from Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> --- I would be interested why an application wants to use a SOCK_SEQPACKET packet and also expects message loss when providing a too small receive buffer? >From my understanding SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_STREAM are both reliable. For me it looks like the description of recvmsg() is missing a differentiation between SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_SEQPACKET. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-287135-7501-orTk2pZxgC>