Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:14:34 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Joerg Pernfuss <elessar@bsdforen.de> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved Message-ID: <20060926031317.U73166@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060923130543.Y1938@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060917091750.T74654@fledge.watson.org> <20060922025016.6bc38025@loki.starkstrom.lan> <20060923130543.Y1938@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Robert Watson wrote: > Right now the id(1) command in -STABLE doesn't print audit properties of the > process, but I've attached a patch that causes it to do so when "id -a" is > run. If you could apply this patch and run "id -a" as root, that would be > helpful. I've merged this patch to 6-STABLE, but we've renamed the flag "-A" so as not to conflict with a flag in Solaris. If you could let me know what the results of running "id -A" are, when running as root su'd from a number user that should be getting audited, that would be helpful. Thanks! Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060926031317.U73166>