Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 22:02:46 -0500 (EST) From: Darren Henderson <darren@nighttide.net> To: Artem Koutchine <matrix@ipform.ru> Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0101052152560.32188-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <000701c07750$eb585e60$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Artem Koutchine wrote:
> So, as I see we two possible solutions and one probable soultion:
You missed one. If these machines are on your lan/wan then the users are
somehow beholding to you. While not a technical solution, you should not
over look a strong, easily understandable, clearly exposed, widely and
repeatedly disseminated security policy paired with swift and decisive
administrative consequences for breaching that policy.
You shouldn't over look the technical possibilities but when the potential
problem is on the inside it is nearly impossible to deal with it
completely in that realm. Especially if you are dealing with fairly savy
users as I believe you mentioned back in December.
______________________________________________________________________
Darren Henderson darren@nighttide.net
Help fight junk e-mail, visit http://www.cauce.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0101052152560.32188-100000>