Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:12:35 +0300
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: sysv_ipc.c broken in v1.30 (was Re: sysvshm appearse broken in -current)
Message-ID:  <20061228141235.GA92268@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20061222204908.C65423@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <20061216055903.GA2712@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216111656.GA7501@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216112117.P72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216114426.GA7735@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216120746.E72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216125136.GA1094@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061217153914.GA30048@nagual.pp.ru> <20061221233855.GA95581@nagual.pp.ru> <20061222204908.C65423@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:51:05PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> I return from Oxford.  If you want, you can try removing the ipcperm() call 
> from shmget_existing() and restore the sysv_ipc.c change and see how that 
> works for you?

Yes, it works, all t-shm tests passed.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061228141235.GA92268>