Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:53:19 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <ma+fscsi@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Ultra 160 - what HA works well with 4.9 and 5-CURRENT? Message-ID: <20031104105319.GB9585@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, What SCSI Ultra 160 host adaptors work best with 4.9 and 5-CURRENT? I consider buying a qlogic 12160 or LSI 53C1010 based HA. The board is supposed to be used in software RAID1. (AMD XP1700+ w/ VIA KT333) Are there concerns that I should be aware of, for instance isp(4) mentions error recovery after timeouts? Which works better? Anything else I should consider? Does it make a difference which brand the card will be? I have good experience with the 53C875 based Tekram cards so far, but U160 is a different League than UWSCSI. Thanks in advance, -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031104105319.GB9585>