Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 18:16:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: mono@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194660] lang/mono Add mono/metadata/mono-route.c for non-Linux ParseRouteInfo_local Message-ID: <bug-194660-23699-NM5m54TtoJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194660-23699@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194660-23699@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D194660 --- Comment #17 from Romain Tarti=C3=A8re <romain@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Ben Woods from comment #16) > Thanks for that. > So if my pull request is accepted upstream, and we incorporate the change > into the FreeBSD port using a PATCHFILES statement in the Makefile, I ass= ume > the Makefile.in will not be changed? Would we have to maintain the changes > to that as a separate patch file? Exactly, if possible, I prefer having reference to bug-fixes as PATCHFILES = but since this change is quite large and has an impact on the generated Makefile.in, a separate patch is preferred in this case (as you attached). As soon as upstream merges your changes, I'll commit that patch, but in case they have some more suggestions, I guess we would have benefits to wait for= a "final" version. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194660-23699-NM5m54TtoJ>