Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 May 2011 16:30:58 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r222183 - head/lib/clang
Message-ID:  <20110522213058.GB21144@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110522202256.GA43412@freebsd.org>
References:  <201105221632.p4MGWjUb081825@svn.freebsd.org> <20110522202256.GA43412@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:22:56PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> The problem here is deeper in my opinion. What FreeBSD calls
> amd64 the rest of the world (ie. linux) calls x86_64, I think
> that instead of this we should teach llvm/clang about "amd64".
> Maybe as a FreeBSD-only diff.

If we move away from "amd64", we are going to need a _substantial_ amount
of work on ports.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110522213058.GB21144>