Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 02:52:15 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <3866.895139535@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 14 May 1998 12:47:18 %2B0800." <199805140447.MAA11059@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I guess the real question is... where do we want to end up? Do we want > to end up with a seamlessly integrated IPv6, or something that's kept at Seamless works for me, anyway. :) > arm's length? Also, there are other IPv6 implementations out there, > perhaps the most important is the Linux 2.1.x version. Where do they put > there include files? Putting our includes in a gratuitously different We're so different than Linux from the API perspective that this may well end up being something of a fool's errand. Sure, we could take substantial pains to be header-compatible with IPv6, but I think we'd only find that we were still incompatible with most of their other networking headers. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3866.895139535>