Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 19:18:23 +0100 From: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-pkgbase@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Message-ID: <aMcG70H_3SSDX4pK@amaryllis.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <2041747F-BB8F-4561-90C0-6AFBFEC3D05F@yahoo.com> References: <7C39A648-EFF8-4195-9979-D740C8A86F99.ref@yahoo.com> <7C39A648-EFF8-4195-9979-D740C8A86F99@yahoo.com> <aMbnduJEAiuIyDRh@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <2041747F-BB8F-4561-90C0-6AFBFEC3D05F@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Mark Millard: > On Sep 14, 2025, at 09:04, Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Mark Millard: > >> Lexi Winter <ivy_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote on > >>> packages: Add meta-package sets > >> [poudriere installs more packages than before] > > [...] > > please file a PR against poudriere for that. > >[...] > Seems odd that I should be the one specifying interface > changes between how pkg/pkg-static is used by FreeBSD > and poudriere-devel and suggesting how they be handled, > especially by using words someone else supplied. i don't expect you to specify the interface between (pkg)base and poudriere, but understand that we're on a very tight timeframe to get pkgbase ready for the 15.0 release, and i have several other fixes that i need to land before that can happen and limited time to work on those. so, since you discovered this issue, and have a system that can reproduce the issue and test a fix, i thought it would be reasonable for you to report the issue to poudriere. the alternative is that i will put this low-priority issue on my TODO list and get around to reporting it at some point, but that might not be before 15.0-R and it might be not in the timeframe you were expecting the issue to be addressed. i don't want to seem dismissive here, because you have found an actual issue that should be fixed, but i think it's reasonable to assume that someone who runs CURRENT or STABLE would be willing to report issues in third-party software without needing me to act as an intermediary. this doesn't mean you need to take on the responsibility of designing the fix for this issue; if there's really a need for more input from me here i'm sure Bryan is quite capable of handling that. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaMcG7AAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YIeVAP9WWZq2tmwbSeKw3gN2ByMskcNsMqsfBhaPgjURMbfcdQEAoyIYfGn5BDVB MwiuFZvfOP+HIPNPhZvgXD9K9MB5RgI= =m0s9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aMcG70H_3SSDX4pK>