Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:19:44 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r206082 - in head: . share/man/man7 share/mk sys/conf Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004021419100.72297@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB5D140.5070208@cs.duke.edu> References: <201004020655.o326tWax079882@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004021054050.72297@fledge.watson.org> <4BB5D140.5070208@cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > >> I think there's a reasonable argument that we should be compiling options >> KDTRACE_HOOKS into GENERIC, and likewise enabling CTF on the kernel by >> default in 9.x. Part of the point of DTrace is that it "just works", and >> we already compile CDDL modules by default (and the hooks don't affect the >> license of the base kernel as far as I'm aware). Any thoughts on this? > > I vaguely remember that there were some problems where CTF was incompatible > with debugging, and dumps from CTF enabled kernels were unhelpful. Was this > true, and (more importantly), has it been fixed? Hmm. I'll investigate that this weekend, I also have recollections of some issues here, but haven't been running into them myself so perhaps they were fixed. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1004021419100.72297>