Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: bz0fbd@zabbadoz.net To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, dfr@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r195181 - in head/sys: nfsclient nfsserver Message-ID: <20090630051641.T22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <200906300318.n5U3Ipr4066645@svn.freebsd.org> References: <200906300318.n5U3Ipr4066645@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, John Baldwin wrote: > Author: jhb > Date: Tue Jun 30 03:18:51 2009 > New Revision: 195181 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195181 > > Log: > Fix build with NFS_LEGACYRPC enabled after the socket upcall locking > changes. is this really a good idea, considering that NFS_LEGACYRPC is on the "removal list" for 8.0? Will it go or will it stay? I thought it was already (partly) gone? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630051641.T22887>