Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:12:00 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>, Sergey Zaharchenko <doublef-ctm@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: nve related LOR triggered by lots of small packets, and a hard hang Message-ID: <45DA9F40.1070604@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070220014535.GC912@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20070110120731.GA1515@shark.localdomain> <20070210171130.D47107@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <45D98B62.1060402@yandex.ru> <20070220014535.GC912@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > Because your dmesg for nfe(4) shows 'obsoleted if_watchdog interface' > message I think you've used stock nfe(4) on CURRENT. > Try overhauld nfe(4) at the following URL. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfe.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfereg.h > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfevar.h > > The new nfe(4) has several protections for watchdog timeout errors > reported on the driver. One user repored TSO related issues for > the new driver so if you encounter strange errors in the new driver > please turn off TSO capability(e.g. #ifconfig nfe0 -tso) Thanks! This driver seems more stable for me! -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45DA9F40.1070604>