Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:38 +0200
From:      Gareth de Vaux <bsd@lordcow.org>
To:        Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, luigi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules
Message-ID:  <20100914115438.GA61728@lordcow.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100914113053.GA19053@icarus.home.lan>
References:  <20100909153902.GA28341@lordcow.org> <20100909162009.GA80375@icarus.home.lan> <20100910114908.GA55978@lordcow.org> <20100914103657.GA57521@lordcow.org> <20100914110302.GA84971@icarus.home.lan> <20100914111200.GA59889@lordcow.org> <20100914113053.GA19053@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Regarding net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout=15000 -- you don't see any
> improvement at all?  That's a bit strange.  There's probably something

If there was an improvement it was subtle (I was doing sporadic
measurements), just that in the end my firewall was getting overloaded
either way.

> FWIW, I'd recommend keeping an appended log of output from something
> like this script:

will do



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100914115438.GA61728>