Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curent Centos 7 and bhyve Message-ID: <201808111509.w7BF99Ei028178@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <20180811150227.GB66961@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Shawn Webb wrote: > > > > > > Are there issues with Current CEntos and bhyve? > > > > > > > > > > Sure there are, please look at > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230453 > > > > > > > > Booting in UEFI mode works. > > > > > > This means we need an update to /usr/local/share/examples/vm-bhyve/centos7.conf ? > > > It says 'loader="grub"' for the present. > > > > > > Do you have a vm config to boot centos7 in UEFI mode you could share? > > > > I just use /usr/share/examples/bhyve/vmrun.sh. I don't use any > > third-party utility to manage bhyve VMs. vmrun.sh is pretty > > straight-forward. > > Thanks for replying. However, I highly recommend vm-bhyve, maybe you > should give it a try. You will love the ease of VM creation and > provisioning, network management, ZFS integration (VM snapshots and > cloning), console and datastore management etc. Though it has a lot of features, it also has some short comings, like you can not spec a vm to be wired in memory, which IMHO is the only way to insure consistent VM performance. Its artificial restriction of 16 character VM names is also a fair bit annoying. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201808111509.w7BF99Ei028178>