Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:48:38 -0500 From: Gerard <gerard@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD Question <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [HOW-TO] cvsup for ports -- Re: compact portsnap db Message-ID: <20080106154838.608e23c7@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <47813CFF.5050401@gmail.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080107003852.17643A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <47813CFF.5050401@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:41:35 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > 1. Csup is in the base system thus obvious preferred to either cvsup > or portsnap Correct me if I am wrong; however, I thought that 'portsnap' was part of the base system. -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ... F. H. Wales (1936) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHgT6u6DWTaTcTwMkRAv6zAKDhtRbYsxFPpRYSSkTmwRKnahcq7gCgj3Za msqFmD3d+uU5UQ93lMAttP8= =bbqy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080106154838.608e23c7>