Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:57:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: Shteryana Shopova <soc-shteryana@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bsnmp FREEBSD-Xlist NEWS TODO VERSION oid-list src/contrib/bsnmp/gensnmptree gensnmptree.1 gensnmptree.c src/contrib/bsnmp/lib asn1.c asn1.h snmpclient.c support.h src/contrib/bsnmp/snmp_mibII mibII.c mibII.h mibII_interfa Message-ID: <20060404095305.V40934@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <61b573980603311220g632bd5f8v8efd8bde7fcd5ecc@mail.gmail.com> References: <61b573980603311220g632bd5f8v8efd8bde7fcd5ecc@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Shteryana Shopova wrote: SS>The work I've been doing lately on bsnmpget | set | walk is currently SS>under //depot/user/soc-shteryana/bsnmp/... on perforce.freebsd.org SS>( http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/user/soc%2dshteryana/bsnmp&HIDEDEL=NO SS>- only for browsing). SS>I can prepare patches against current and stable if there's anyone SS>interested in testing the code. It's definatelly more user-friendly SS>and stable now than in September, 2005 but there are a few bits that SS>are not implemented yet - namely printing OCTETSTRING types according SS>to their TextualConvention, if any, and displaying the corresponding SS>string rather than an integer for enumerated types - that is print: SS>ifOperStatus[1] = up SS>rather than SS>ifOperStatus[1] = 1; SS>The approach I've taken so far is looking up the information for a SS>string corresponding to a numerical OID in the files produces by SS>gensnmpdef(1) (under /usr/share/snmp/defs/ , such a file can be SS>produced by gensnmpdef(1) for every valid file containing mib SS>definitions), and they lack the information for the missing bits - I SS>might need to make modifications to gensnmpdef(1) and the format of SS>the files it produces - I need to get approval for that though both SS>from Philip Paeps (philip@ - my mentor) and Harti Brandt (harti@) - SS>and I don't have ready patches to send them yet. Go ahead, but don't forget to modify gensnmptree so that it does not choke on the .def files. On that topic: I'm thinking for some time now to move to SMInG instead. This looks like it is more easily parseable than ASN.1. What I don't know is the state of it: was it abondoned entirely or is there still work going on, or what? Anybody knows what went on on the IETF SNMP meetings when it was discussed? harti SS>The man pages on perforce are outdated as well - patch to update them SS>is comming (as well as a couple of fixes). SS>Wow - that sounded just like a monthly report ;) . On 3/31/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Florent Thoumie wrote: > > > Is there any progress on the bsnmp{get,walk} side? > > well yes, Shteryana is working on them and my impression was she > last worked on man pages. > I guess it's mostly a problem of code review and integration at > this point. I hope to have some days off in the near future to > find the time for a first pass and I am currently thinking > how she could best make the code available for others to test... > > I'll point her at this message an perhaps she'll comment on this > herself;-) > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT > _______________________________________________ > cvs-src@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-src-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060404095305.V40934>