Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:12:32 +0100 (CET) From: "Anders Nor Berle" <debolaz@debolaz.com> To: <daniel@interq.or.jp> Cc: <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: about Jail Message-ID: <35580.62.179.128.205.1012846352.squirrel@webmail.debolaz.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96LJ1.1b7.1020204111201.26956A-100000@imap.interq.or.jp> References: <Pine.GSO.3.96LJ1.1b7.1020204111201.26956A-100000@imap.interq.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Hi fellow freebsd users, > > Going through the isp archive, I found useful information about Jail. There are few > comments where someone mentioned that Jail is not suitable for a large scale domain > hosting due to overhead. I assume that overhead here refers to disk usage for > creating an each jail environment. But, since large IDE drives are so cheap these > days, I don't really consider it overhead. To those who are providing domain hosting > with Jail, how do you usually set up a machine and how many Jails do you have on > each machine? > I see no other overhead than disk usage either on my systems, so I assume that must be it. I set it up the pretty standard way described in jail(8). I have some custom patches that allows things like top to run without kernel memory access too. Only limit for the number of jails to run on a machine I've run into are disk and memory. - Anders Nor Berle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35580.62.179.128.205.1012846352.squirrel>