Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:06:18 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9 Message-ID: <20080316140618.1532db62@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20080316102336.GA44640@freebsd.org> References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <62449124@ipt.ru> <20080315135046.50957aqphwntgv40@intranet.encontacto.net> <40994934@ipt.ru> <20080316095023.4a64aecd@deskjail> <20080316102336.GA44640@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> (Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:23:36 +0100): > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:25 +0300): > > > > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:50:46 -0500 eculp wrote: > > > > > > I had already set the kernel to 2.4.20 and though that there might be > > > > an advantage to go to f7 and a 2.6.?? kernel. UPDATING doesn't give > > > > me that info. If there is major advantage, like flash9, the new skype > > > > with video, etc. I will think about it it bit more. > > > > > > Can't say anything about 2.4.20. Only 2.4.2 (the default one) and > > > 2.6.16 (with is intended to become a default in the future) are > > > tested. Use any other values at your risk. > > > > 2.4.20 expects the NPTL in the kernel, but our kernel only activates > > I seriously doubt that... NPTL is 2.6 stuff Wasn't 2.4.20 the backport of the NPTL stuff from RedHat? Or do I mix this with futexes or something else? Bye, Alexander. -- BOFH excuse #127: Sticky bits on disk http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080316140618.1532db62>