Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Mar 2001 19:51:45 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Changing rsync to use SSH rather than RSH by default
Message-ID:  <3AA3D231.ED6EAD14@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200102260748.f1Q7me520862@freefall.freebsd.org> <86lmqt6ekc.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010226002530.A21297@hub.freebsd.org> <86k86d6cge.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010226160325.C2746@dragon.nuxi.com> <86hf18t96x.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Akinori MUSHA wrote:

> At Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:03:25 -0800,
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > Akinori MUSHA-san has asked if I would be willing to change the default
> > remote transport from RSH to SSH.  How do people feel about that?  Of
> > course we have SSH in the base system, but not all other OSs do.
>
> We've got enough those in favor here.  Let's do it! :)

I'm not very adamant about it because of POLA, but as long as the port and
package will be printing an appropriate message on installation it should be
OK.

-Maxim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AA3D231.ED6EAD14>