Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:09:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: n@nectar.com, jdp@polstra.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <200007281209.OAA12917@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000727111119.93015D-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Jul, Robert Watson wrote:
> So my preference here is: permissions and ownership in the base install
> are fine. The default compile (and preferably install) should allow users
> to include group-writable shared library paths, if not world-writable
> paths. Consider our adduser implementation: each user is in their own
> group anyway :-).
Not ldconfig related:
What about adding checks to /etc/security for permission critial parts
of the system (perhaps controled by periodic.conf)?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that?
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = 7423 F3E6 3A7E B334 A9CC B10A 1F5F 130A A638 6E7E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007281209.OAA12917>