Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 06:48:24 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org>, lite2@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs tree preperation.. Message-ID: <199608202248.GAA27976@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Aug 1996 17:41:08 %2B0900." <Pine.SV4.3.93.960820171522.21724A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Michael Hancock wrote:
> My vote is for 3:. 4: looks very nice, but I think it's better to have
> source. Though, I won't complain if 4 is chosen.
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
>
> > > 3: like #2, but place explicit markers on the current branch and use th
ose
> > > for merging
> >
> > This is close to what I do locally.
> >
> > > 4: Give p3 a shot (http://www.p3.com).
> >
> > I'm game if it's okay with everyone else. I've always wanted to try
> > out p3 and this will force me to do so.
> >
> > So, either 3 or 4 is okay with me.
Now that I think about it some more, I dont know that I have the energy to
get p3 operational for our use, so it looks like #3 it is (cvsup from main
code into /home/lite2, with a private branch and added merge markers)
Ok, it sounds like we have a plan. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll set this
up after I've had breakfast in a few hours...
Cheers,
-Peter
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608202248.GAA27976>