Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:31:17 +0000 From: Olafur Osvaldsson <oli@isnic.is> To: Mij <mij@bitchx.it> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mx vs ns Message-ID: <20040120153117.GL86062@isnic.is> In-Reply-To: <93570F3C-4B56-11D8-9538-000A95CCF092@bitchx.it> References: <93570F3C-4B56-11D8-9538-000A95CCF092@bitchx.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mij, On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Mij wrote: > is it prudent to have 4 ns and just 1 mail exchanger? I see nothing wrong with this setup as when a MX is down the mail gets queued at the sender server untill the MX is reachable again but NS requests don't queue up and people get impatient so multiple NS records are needed but not multiple MX. Also, multiple MX servers makes more work for the postmaster in regard to filters and such in addition to be not needed. /Oli --=20 Olafur Osvaldsson Systems Administrator Internet a Islandi hf. Tel: +354 525-5291 Email: oli@isnic.is
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040120153117.GL86062>