Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:41:07 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: request for review Message-ID: <3C4493E3.5E322D19@mindspring.com> References: <19068.1011092026@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I think it is bogus for devices other than disks to flout a > va_blocksize, but I am on the other hand not sure what the > relevant (if any) standards say. > > If this patch makes things better, I'm all for it. Ugh. Hard call. I agree with you in principle, but looking at the "stat(2)" man page: u_int32_t st_blksize; /* optimal blocksize for I/O */ Sort of implies that you'll get useful information back for anything. For regular files, you'd expect this to be the FS block size, almost... 8-(. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C4493E3.5E322D19>