Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:22:04 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject:   docs/32542: tuning(7) inaccurate
Message-ID:  <200112060022.fB60M4x08864@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         32542
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       tuning(7) inaccurate
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Dec 05 16:30:01 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Robert Watson
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
NAI Labs
>Environment:

src/share/man/man7/tuning.7 on -CURRENT includes a number of
inaccuracies regarding kern.maxusers.  First, kern.maxusers is
not a writable sysctl (although it is exported as a read-only
sysctl), it's a boot-time tunable.  Second, the -CURRENT man page
incorrectly distinguishes the behavior regarding kern.maxusers
between -CURRENT and -STABLE.  Both versions support modifying the
value at boottime using loader.conf.  The -STABLE version should be
updated to reflect that this is the case (rather than recommending
a kernel recompile), and the -CURRENT version should refer to it as
a tunable, and stop casting aspersions at -STABLE.

Note that in -CURRENT, nmbclusters is also a boot-time tunable,
but that in -STABLE, it still requires a kernel recompile.

There may be other aging information in tuning(7) that needs updating.

>Description:
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112060022.fB60M4x08864>