Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:13:50 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com Cc: kientzle@acm.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked Message-ID: <20031122.221350.117024907.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <3FC02538.7040903@mindspring.com> References: <20031123131536.M3946@gamplex.bde.org> <20031122.195519.127506801.imp@bsdimp.com> <3FC02538.7040903@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <3FC02538.7040903@mindspring.com>
Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > : I agree. termcap.small is amazingly uncurrent. However, perhaps some
: > : merging and reducing is in order. Why is a full cons25 or vt2xx needed?
: > : vi only needs a few capabilities. I think we mostly use copies of large
: > : termcap entries because copying the whole things is easier.
: >
: > You have a good point. My termcap was done so that we could run a
: > number of applications...
: >
: > Grepping seems unsatisfying to find out which keys are used. Do you
: > have a list?
: >
: > Warner
:
: Is the extra maintenance worth it to save a few hundred bytes?
Generating them automatically can be kind of difficult. termcap
doesn't change that often.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031122.221350.117024907.imp>