Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:15:29 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204426] Processes terminating cannot access memory
Message-ID:  <bug-204426-16-7sNut95Imi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204426

--- Comment #17 from rblayzor@inoc.net ---
I'm not claiming that the bug here that I've reported does not exist in 10.=
0 or
10.1, I'm just saying that we've seen this bug during our entire release cy=
cle
of 10.1. (which was almost a good year).

We only started noticing this issue with process seg faults after updating =
to
10.2. We were running the same versions of Dovecot and Exim on 10.1 when we
started noticing it in 10.2. That's when we force rebuilt all of the binari=
es
under 10.2 to no avail.

Dovecot and Exim are NOT the only processes that we've seen core out, they =
are
just the processes we see the most often. I've seen cron do it, ntpd and so=
me
other port binaries. I remember looking at their core files and seeing the =
same
"cannot access memory" errors in the backtrace. It was only then I started
paying attention more and have been gathering more and more debug informati=
on
on this strange issue.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204426-16-7sNut95Imi>