Date: 16 Jul 2002 12:10:10 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com>, jos@catnook.com, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <xzpvg7g2dbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <92474.1026812648@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <92474.1026812648@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <xzpit3g3u08.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > I'm not a big fan of having Tcl in the base system, but - what are we > > waiting for? libh should have entered the tree a long time ago, > > there's absolutely nothing to be gained from leaving it out in the > > cold. > It was my impression that we had abandonned the "lets put it in the > tree and hope somebody else finishes it" policy long time ago ? "somebody else"? Unless alex@ dropped dead while I wasn't looking, libh is actively maintained. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvg7g2dbx.fsf>